New
Trending
SM
Clara Fargo
EBMT Clinical Research Quality Assurance Coordinator
I have finalised the demo for the ICH-GCP E6 R3 refresher course. Overall, I liked the content and the interface. I also want to thank Whitehall Train...
Competency Assessment and Authorisation for Accredited Laboratories Course & Certification
Intermediate
Watch Preview
4.8
★★★★★
98% Recommended
4 hours
187 active users
3 points
Watch Preview
Your Study Basket
Competency Assessment and Authorisation for Accredited Laboratories
| Total | |
🎁 FREE Bonus Included
eBookWorth £29— Yours FREE when you purchase today.
VAT is levied as per your country’s applicable rules and rates at checkout
Save more with a monthly or annual plan that includes this course
Secure Payment Service
Rest assured we use secure processes to protect your payment.
Secured by:
About
The Competency Assessment and Authorisation for Accredited Laboratories training provides a comprehensive, practical guide to establishing, maintaining, and defending regulatory-compliant competency assessment programs across US CLIA and international ISO frameworks.
This Competency Assessment and Authorisation for Accredited Laboratories Course & Certification covers the six mandatory CLIA evaluation elements, mandatory semiannual and annual cadence triggers, 42 CFR 493.1235 written quality system policy requirements, and ISO 15189:2022 functional competence, authorization, and continuing education requirements. Learners will understand how to design pre-established objective acceptance criteria, manage instrument change re-evaluations, structure multi-site Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) scaling, execute remedial training, and maintain audit-ready, linked personnel records. The course also addresses inspector evidence standards, standard vs. condition deficiency enforcement tiers under 42 CFR Part 493 Subpart R, and the operational boundaries of e-learning products regarding direct bench observations. Upon successful completion, learners receive a certification demonstrating their expertise in laboratory personnel governance and accreditation compliance.
Who Should Enrol?
- Laboratory Directors and Assistant Directors
- Technical Consultants and Technical Supervisors
- General Supervisors and Quality Managers
- Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) Coordinators
- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Specialists
- Medical Laboratory Scientists and Testing Personnel
- Regulatory Affairs and Compliance Professionals
- Accreditation Officers and Quality System Auditors
- Managers responsible for laboratory inspection readiness and CLIA/ISO compliance
- Anyone involved in laboratory competency assessment, staff authorization, or quality management
What you will learn
Understand federal regulatory frameworks and quality management standards, including CLIA 42 CFR 493 competency rules, 42 CFR 493.1235 written policies, and ISO 15189:2022 clause 6.2 requirements.
Master the implementation of CLIA's six required assessment elements, semiannual and annual evaluation cadences, and targeted re-evaluation protocols for instrument replacements and scope changes.
Develop practical strategies for assessor eligibility, technical consultant delegation, formal personnel authorization, multi-site POCT scaling logistics, and managing non-competent remedial actions.
Gain expertise in audit readiness, standard vs. condition deficiency enforcement tiers under Subpart R, acceptable Plans of Correction (PoC), and establishing attributable, linkage-ready personnel records.
Course Syllabus
- What competence is, and what a competency assessment is evidence of
- Training is not competence, and a training record does not evidence it
- Proficiency testing is not competency assessment, in either direction
- Authorisation is a separate act, and it is somebody's named duty
- The regimes a laboratory group may be inside at once
- The finding three regulators describe in almost the same words
- Where this course stops, and what it leaves to the bench
- Where competency assessment sits, and the written policy requirement
- The six procedures, one at a time, and what each is evidence of
- Moderate and high complexity: identical elements, different assessor
- The provider-performed microscopy variant, and why it has five
- Direct observation after the 2025 guidance change
- What an element does not cover, and the gaps laboratories read into it
- Mapping an existing programme onto the six, honestly
- The frequency wording, and the sub-paragraph it sits in
- When the clock starts, and why date of hire is the wrong answer
- The first year, and every year after it
- The accreditor's tolerance, and why it is not a different rule
- The methodology or instrumentation trigger, and what it requires
- What does not restart the cycle, however much it feels as though it should
- Scheduling a programme that survives leave and turnover
- The technical consultant, technical supervisor and general supervisor
- What changed for assessor eligibility under the personnel rule
- Why testing personnel cannot assess their peers
- Delegation: what may be delegated, to whom, and what the record shows
- Assessing across a specialty you do not hold
- The director's duty to say in writing what each person may do
- Authorisation to perform and authorisation to release
- What clause 6.2 requires, sub-clause by sub-clause
- Competence requirements set by the laboratory, for each role
- Why there is no list of six and no cadence in the standard
- The accreditation body's published refusal to prescribe a scheme
- External quality assessment performance is not competence, either way
- Continuing education and professional development
- The relationship to ISO/IEC 17025, stated without over-claiming
- Starting from the role and the test, not from the form
- Writing criteria before the assessment, and why the order matters
- Matching an assessment method to what you need to establish
- Designing problem-solving assessment that is not a quiz
- The point-of-care population, and scale as a design constraint
- What happens when somebody does not meet the criteria
- Remediation, reassessment, and the record of both
- The written policy, and why it is the item most often cited
- What a competency record carries beyond the word competent
- Signatures, dates, and the assessor's own qualification evidence
- Retention, and what to do where the requirement is silent
- How an inspector actually samples a competency file
- Deficiency categories, the response window, and evidence of implementation
- Self-inspection, and finding it before the inspector does
- Which of the six elements e-learning can contribute to, and which it cannot
- What a competency platform administers, and what it does not design
- Reading a vendor claim, and the claims that fail an inspection
- Writing an honest internal claim about your own training
- The GCP overlay: laboratory staff and the sponsor's oversight duty
- What the medicines regulator has published about training records
- The statutory training duties outside accreditation altogether
- The two models restated side by side
- One design error, named by three different regulators
- The six errors that cost the most, and how each is fixed
- A ninety-day plan, and the order to do it in
- Glossary of key terms
- Assessment and credential
- Certificate of completion
- 📘 Bonus: Competency Assessment and Authorisation for Accredited Laboratories eBook (Free with purchase)
Course Benefits
eBook
Access the course content in eBook format, which can be downloaded and read on your device.
CPD Points
Gain Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Points, accredited by The Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians of the United Kingdom. These can be used to count towards the distance learning element of any scheme that comes under the umbrella of The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges or any other scheme for which there is mutual recognition.
Certification
Receive a personal certificate to show your subject knowledge on course completion.
Affordable
You get excellent value through our cost-effective prices. We can also offer you group discounts on larger purchases.
Flexibility
The course saves you time through the convenience of online availability. This lets you complete the interactive course at your own comfort.
Keep Up to Date
You will stay up to date with any changes to 42 CFR Part 493 and the CLIA personnel provisions, the regulator's competency assessment guidance and memoranda, accreditation body checklist editions and item numbering, ISO 15189:2022, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and CLSI QMS03, as our training courses are constantly monitored, reviewed and updated.
Learn from Industry Experts
The course content has been developed by laboratory quality and accreditation specialists working from the regulations themselves, the regulator's current published guidance and the accreditation bodies' own attributable material, so that supervisors and quality managers can design, document and defend a competency programme rather than administer somebody else's.
Our Certified Customers
Learner Rating & Reviews
4.7
★★★★★★
Average Rating
536 global ratings
★★★★★
87.0%
★★★★★
5.0%
★★★★★
3.0%
★★★★★
3.0%
★★★★★
2.0%
Best Seller
